General Property and Casualty Liability
Call us : (212) 482-0001
Call us : (212) 482-0001
Emily Mann litigates personal injury cases, in addition to helping clients with matrimonial and family law issues. Clients are drawn to her empathetic approach as much as her ability to guide them through any mediation and court appearance. Emily has represented the nation's largest insurance companies in actions arising out of personal injury and insurance coverage. She also spent many years litigating the same type of cases on the plaintiff side. She has appeared before the Court of Appeals and the Appellate Division of the State of New York, where she zealously represented her clients both in writing and in oral argument.
Prior to joining Russo & Gould, Emily worked with another regional firm, as well as at her family's general practice firm. Her experience in representing insurance companies in coverage disputes allows her to quickly read, interpret and explain legal jargon to her clients.
A native of Connecticut, Emily enjoys going to local beaches when she can, reading about history and facetiming with her niece and nephew in Portland, Oregon.
Congratulations go out to Tashi Vaish who got a unanimous defense verdict on liability earlier today in Supreme Kings on the Salway Nasser v. Tadhbir Singh and Jean R. Joseph case. The plaintiff, who did not know who caused the accident, was a passenger in the insured''s livery vehicle headed to JFK Airport. The co-defendant was also a livery driver and neither driver could be produced for either a deposition or trial.
Russo & Gould Partner Charles ("Chuck") B. Stokes, Esquire has successfully defended a claim for more than $600,000 in compensatory damages brought by the owners of an upscale Burlington County, New Jersey residence. In Walsh v. AmGuard, Plaintiffs filed suit in state court claiming that their homeowner''s carrier had failed to compensate them adequately for damages they allegedly sustained as a result of a 2019 storm. They claimed that high winds tore shingles from their roof, allowing rain to infiltrate much of the building and either damage or destroy walls, floors, doors, windows and other elements of the residence, as well as extensive personal property. They claimed that much of the damage was caused by mold, which they claimed developed during an alleged delay in investigating and adjusting the loss.