Call us : (212) 482-0001
Jennifer Cheong is a highly skilled attorney with extensive experience in insurance defense, litigation, and legal strategy practicing in the Federal and State Courts of New Jersey. She currently serves as a Partner at Russo & Gould, LLP in its Cranford, NJ office, having been with the firm since 2023.
In her role, Jennifer handles a variety of complex litigated matters, including commercial general liability, automobile accidents, premise liability, and professional liability cases. She is known for her expertise in case assessment, legal strategy development, and achieving favorable settlements through mediation, arbitration, and negotiation.
She holds a Juris Doctor from Albany Law School of Union University and a Bachelor of Arts in Philosophy from Hamilton College. Jennifer also demonstrates a strong commitment to community outreach, having served on the Vestry of the Church of Good Shepherd and volunteered with Rahway Food for Friends.
In her downtime, Jennifer enjoys spending time with her family, reading, science fiction movies, and has a special appreciation of all things Star Trek and Jean-Luc Picard.
Congratulations go out to Tashi Vaish who got a unanimous defense verdict on liability earlier today in Supreme Kings on the Salway Nasser v. Tadhbir Singh and Jean R. Joseph case. The plaintiff, who did not know who caused the accident, was a passenger in the insured''s livery vehicle headed to JFK Airport. The co-defendant was also a livery driver and neither driver could be produced for either a deposition or trial.
Russo & Gould Partner Charles ("Chuck") B. Stokes, Esquire has successfully defended a claim for more than $600,000 in compensatory damages brought by the owners of an upscale Burlington County, New Jersey residence. In Walsh v. AmGuard, Plaintiffs filed suit in state court claiming that their homeowner''s carrier had failed to compensate them adequately for damages they allegedly sustained as a result of a 2019 storm. They claimed that high winds tore shingles from their roof, allowing rain to infiltrate much of the building and either damage or destroy walls, floors, doors, windows and other elements of the residence, as well as extensive personal property. They claimed that much of the damage was caused by mold, which they claimed developed during an alleged delay in investigating and adjusting the loss.
